From: Denis B. <dbi...@wa...> - 2013-09-30 07:13:17
|
Hi, the new strings to translate, "Package is present!" and "Package not recognized!", should IMHO: 1. be either both sentences (with a verb) or both not sentences (without verb); 2. not contain an exclamation mark if okay. Hence I suggest: "Package present" "Package not recognized!" or, because human beings like symmetry ;): "Package present" "Package not present!" -- Denis |
From: Tim H. <tho...@te...> - 2013-09-30 18:17:49
|
I agree. Do we need the tooltip "Package present" at all? This should be the default assumption and IMO we don't need to tell the user. Am 30.09.2013 09:12, schrieb Denis Bitouzé: > Hi, > > the new strings to translate, "Package is present!" and "Package not > recognized!", should IMHO: > > 1. be either both sentences (with a verb) or both not sentences (without > verb); > 2. not contain an exclamation mark if okay. > > Hence I suggest: > > "Package present" > "Package not recognized!" > > or, because human beings like symmetry ;): > > "Package present" > "Package not present!" > -- > Denis > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > TeXstudio-list mailing list > TeX...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list |
From: Denis B. <dbi...@wa...> - 2013-09-30 18:36:24
|
Le lundi 30/09/13 à 20h17, Tim Hoffmann <tho...@te...> a écrit : > I agree. Do we need the tooltip "Package present" at all? This should > be the default assumption and IMO we don't need to tell the user. Indeed. Moreover, would it be possible for the package not present to not only provide a tooltip but also highlight the line? -- Denis |
From: Tim H. <tho...@te...> - 2013-09-30 18:49:12
|
It is not possible to highlight the line. But you can change the format of the missing package name, including its background. IMO this should be enough and its not worth to put additional effort into highlighting the complete line. Am 30.09.2013 20:36, schrieb Denis Bitouzé: > Le lundi 30/09/13 à 20h17, > Tim Hoffmann <tho...@te...> a écrit : > >> I agree. Do we need the tooltip "Package present" at all? This should >> be the default assumption and IMO we don't need to tell the user. > Indeed. Moreover, would it be possible for the package not present to > not only provide a tooltip but also highlight the line? > -- > Denis > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > TeXstudio-list mailing list > TeX...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list |
From: Denis B. <dbi...@wa...> - 2013-09-30 19:15:09
|
Le lundi 30/09/13 à 20h49, Tim Hoffmann <tho...@te...> a écrit : > It is not possible to highlight the line. Okay. > But you can change the format of the missing package name, including > its background. Okay, I didn't notice. BTW, the corresponding strings in the "Syntax Highlighting" -> "LaTeX checking" list are the only ones that are not translatable ("packagePresent", "packageMissing"). In "Syntax Highlighting" lists, other ones are not translatable ("dtx:..." and "diff...") but IMHO, they could (should?). > IMO this should be enough and its not worth to put additional effort > into highlighting the complete line. Agree. -- Denis |
From: Jan S. <sun...@gm...> - 2013-09-30 18:56:09
|
But something should happen if the users hovers over a green colored text ... On 30.09.2013 20:17, Tim Hoffmann wrote: > I agree. Do we need the tooltip "Package present" at all? This should be > the default assumption and IMO we don't need to tell the user. > > Am 30.09.2013 09:12, schrieb Denis Bitouzé: >> Hi, >> >> the new strings to translate, "Package is present!" and "Package not >> recognized!", should IMHO: >> >> 1. be either both sentences (with a verb) or both not sentences (without >> verb); >> 2. not contain an exclamation mark if okay. >> >> Hence I suggest: >> >> "Package present" >> "Package not recognized!" >> >> or, because human beings like symmetry ;): >> >> "Package present" >> "Package not present!" >> -- >> Denis >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> October Webinars: Code for Performance >> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. >> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from >> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> TeXstudio-list mailing list >> TeX...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > TeXstudio-list mailing list > TeX...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list > |
From: Tim H. <tho...@te...> - 2013-09-30 20:04:30
|
We could show the short description as we do in the Package Help dialog (or "No package description available"). Am 30.09.2013 20:55, schrieb Jan Sundermeyer: > But something should happen if the users hovers over a green colored > text ... > > On 30.09.2013 20:17, Tim Hoffmann wrote: >> I agree. Do we need the tooltip "Package present" at all? This should be >> the default assumption and IMO we don't need to tell the user. >> >> Am 30.09.2013 09:12, schrieb Denis Bitouzé: >>> Hi, >>> >>> the new strings to translate, "Package is present!" and "Package not >>> recognized!", should IMHO: >>> >>> 1. be either both sentences (with a verb) or both not sentences (without >>> verb); >>> 2. not contain an exclamation mark if okay. >>> >>> Hence I suggest: >>> >>> "Package present" >>> "Package not recognized!" >>> >>> or, because human beings like symmetry ;): >>> >>> "Package present" >>> "Package not present!" >>> -- >>> Denis >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> October Webinars: Code for Performance >>> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. >>> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from >>> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > >>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>> _______________________________________________ >>> TeXstudio-list mailing list >>> TeX...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> October Webinars: Code for Performance >> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. >> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from >> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> TeXstudio-list mailing list >> TeX...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > TeXstudio-list mailing list > TeX...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list |
From: Denis B. <dbi...@wa...> - 2013-09-30 20:15:27
|
Le lundi 30/09/13 à 22h04, Tim Hoffmann <tho...@te...> a écrit : > We could show the short description as we do in the Package Help > dialog (or "No package description available"). I agree. -- Denis |