From: Benito v. d. Z. <be...@be...> - 2012-05-29 14:42:02
|
> 1. What is also strange in this menu is that the conversion to HTML is > considered separately. It's because that conversion is integrated in txs and doesn't call any external program (except ghostscript). But it is only there, because Texmaker had it. (although the new Texmaker doesn't have it anymore ) On 05/29/12 15:18, Denis Bitouzé wrote: > Le samedi 26/05/12 à 14h08, > "Tim Hoffmann"<hof...@hi...> a écrit : > >> What about the splitting in different submenus >> (Compiler/Converter/Viewer/Graphics) I proosed? I don't have a strong >> opinion there. Just wanted to mention the idea again, in case it got >> lost. If we have one commands menu, we should at least put separators >> between those groups (and as already mentioned View Log does not >> belong here). > Two additional remarks: > > 1. What is also strange in this menu is that the conversion to HTML is > considered separately. > > BTW, LaTeX2HTML is not the only (La)TeX to HTML converter: > > http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=LaTeX2HTML > > and seems to not be actively maintained anymore, see the dates at: > > http://mirror.ibcp.fr/pub/CTAN/help/Catalogue/entries/latex2html.html > > whereas TeX4ht is maintained, see dates at: > > http://svn.gnu.org.ua/viewvc/tex4ht/ > > 2. In Tools -> Commands menu appear the two Index "makers" (MakeIndex > and Texindy), but not not the two Bibliography "makers" (BibTeX and > Biber). |