From: Daniel A. S. <st...@ic...> - 2003-08-25 13:24:23
|
Mats, On Monday, Aug 25, 2003, at 23:03 Australia/Sydney, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > We've had this discussion already when I wrote the TIP for the message > box on classic. Except for the -finemessage option, which can be > removed, my tk_messageBox does not add anything that is not there > already, > and it implements all documented features completely. It is therefore > completely compatible with the existing tk_messageBox on all > platforms. It is an "implementation issue" that just uses the > degree of freedom that already exist in the porting layer. > So please someone.... ah ok, so if I understand correctly it's either withdraw tip 25, remove -finemessage, and integrate so updated changes ASAP or ask for vote on updated tip 25, if accepted, integrate current changes correct? IMHO, if we can get it, the -finemsg functionality would be nice... AFAIR (faintly), the only objection to tip 25 was the wording of -finemessage, if you dig up the old discussions and updated the TIP accordingly (also referencing OSX instead of OS9 etc), I don't see a reason why this wouldn't be accepted. There might be some minor work involved to get -finemessage (or whatever it gets renamed to) working on X11 and Windows. Cheers, Daniel -- ** Daniel A. Steffen ** "And now for something completely ** Dept. of Mathematics ** different" Monty Python ** Macquarie University ** <mailto:st...@ma...> ** NSW 2109 Australia ** <http://www.maths.mq.edu.au/~steffen/> |