From: Jim I. <ji...@ap...> - 2002-10-21 17:17:56
|
Daniel, Yes, this sounds good. Do we need a check for "framework support" really? Even if Tcl is not built with frameworks, it will be able to load an extension that it finds packaged in a framework, won't it? For this reason, I would like to keep the "build Tcl in a framework" and "load extensions packaged as frameworks" separate. Not having the check won't do any harm I think. The patch you submitted doesn't really depend on the --enable-frameworks, it depends on HAVE_CFBUNDLE, which is really orthogonal to whether we actually build Tcl into a framework. And even if this is not there, all that will happen is that the various paths won't get populated, so we will waste a little time (but not much, according to Steve) stat'ing for some directories that aren't there. I say go for it as in... Jim On Sunday, October 20, 2002, at 07:28 PM, Daniel A. Steffen wrote: > > Can we come to a consensus on whether [Patch# 624509] should be > checked in or not (maybe with a tcl check for framework support > added)? if yes, I'd like to get this in for 8.4.1 if at all possible. > > -- Jim Ingham ji...@ap... Developer Tools Apple Computer |