From: Alexandre F. <ale...@gm...> - 2012-10-18 22:36:14
|
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Martin Lemburg <mar...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > What's about introducing a kind of stacked preprocessors? Similar to the > stacked channels? > > Those stacked preprocessors could be "typed", like stacked channels normally > are, or for all executable stuff. > > Or draw such thoughts a too big pictures? Hum, a bit of an overkill, IMO :} Also, for channels, stacking is the meaningful abstraction because order matters, while for 'declarative' stuff like macros, there is no order (and typically a preprocessor will keep trying to expand until stability). Or did I miss your point ? -Alex |