From: Simon B. <smc...@gm...> - 2011-09-21 15:52:22
|
A few hundred bucks is small, but that isn't what we'd been led to believe.. Do you have the name of a person we could talk to get confirmation of this? sdx is of no interest to us On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Donal K. Fellows < don...@ma...> wrote: > On 21/09/2011 14:51, Simon Butler wrote: > >> we are creating a commercial product however this is a "toe in the >> water" effort and we don't have any large customer base at this point. >> my understanding is that the ActiveState licensing requires a large >> upfront payment which would be a problem. >> > > A few hundred bucks is large? (There might also be evaluation licenses > available, but that's not what _I_ know very much about.) Well, provided you > don't need strong protection, you could just package everything up with sdx > (search on the wiki for how to do that) and get something suitable for > internal evaluation. That works just fine. > > Donal. > -- Simon Butler: |