Menu
▾
▴
[Tcl-bugs] [ tcl-Bugs-3401772 ] Link error on tcltest -- visibility of TclFullFinalizationRe
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-08-31 18:37:59
|
Bugs item #3401772, was opened at 2011-08-31 20:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ferrieux You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110894&aid=3401772&group_id=10894 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: 49. Threading Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Alexandre Ferrieux (ferrieux) Assigned to: Don Porter (dgp) Summary: Link error on tcltest -- visibility of TclFullFinalizationRe Initial Comment: [20:10] ferrieux ouch -- link error building tcltest on trunk ! [20:11] ferrieux tclThreadTest.o: In function `ThreadEventProc': tclThreadTest.c:(.text+0x12fd): undefined reference to `TclFullFinalizationRequested' [20:11] ferrieux MODULE_SCOPE is not visible from outside libtcl.so => problematic in satellites like tclThreadTest [20:11] ferrieux stubify ? other option ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Alexandre Ferrieux (ferrieux) Date: 2011-08-31 20:37 Message: Yes, I figured out the --disable-thread, so I could test my new test case. Please comment on the patch (in the other bug). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Porter (dgp) Date: 2011-08-31 20:36 Message: I guess the remaining trouble is that it leaves your patch branch unfixed. You can make do with the --disable-shared workaround? I'm not in a hurry to fix up my [testthread exit] revisions, because I'm no longer sure that I intend [testthread] to continue to exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alexandre Ferrieux (ferrieux) Date: 2011-08-31 20:36 Message: OK, I assume a fossil merge --baseline will do ... once you validate the patch :) Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Porter (dgp) Date: 2011-08-31 20:34 Message: The DAG is unchanged. I don't expect any trouble. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alexandre Ferrieux (ferrieux) Date: 2011-08-31 20:30 Message: Hum, look at the timeline now... can you reconcile my recent branch bug-XXX with the trunk ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Porter (dgp) Date: 2011-08-31 20:27 Message: better short term fix is pull the offending commit off the trunk. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Porter (dgp) Date: 2011-08-31 20:19 Message: looking... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alexandre Ferrieux (ferrieux) Date: 2011-08-31 20:15 Message: Can you do it ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Porter (dgp) Date: 2011-08-31 20:14 Message: Strange that I haven't seen it yet. Doesn't appear in --disable-shared builds perhaps? When the issue's arisen before the solution has been to place the routine in internal stubs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110894&aid=3401772&group_id=10894 |