From: <lm...@bi...> - 2009-05-19 18:14:05
|
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:09:03AM -0700, Jeff Hobbs wrote: > On 19/05/2009 10:55 AM, Larry McVoy wrote: > >BTW, the distribution of our customer's usage of macos is: > > > >MacOS/X 10.5 26% > >MacOS/X 10.4 66% > >MacOS/X 10.3 2% > >MacOS/X 10.2 5% > > > >I'm surprised to see the 10.[23] holdouts, but not at all surprised at the > >10.4 vs 10.5 distribution. > > A comparative number based on recent visits to a typical section of the > ActiveState website (from gAnalytics): > > 1. Intel 10.5 14,169 79.06% > 2. Intel 10.4 1,042 5.81% > 3. PPC 10.4 836 4.66% > 4. Intel 797 4.45% > 5. PPC 10.5 729 4.07% > 6. PPC 330 1.84% > 7. Intel 10.6 17 0.09% > 8. 68K 1 0.01% > > Go Mac Classic! Those are pretty different numbers, you are counting web surfers. I'm counting people who actually have installed our product. Doesn't activestate have those sorts of numbers? There is a big difference between looky loos and real customers. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com |