From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-16 20:11:07
|
Bugs item #1972879, was opened at 2008-05-26 09:16 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by dgp You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110894&aid=1972879&group_id=10894 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: 36. Pathname Management Group: development: 8.6a0 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 9 Private: No Submitted By: miguel sofer (msofer) >Assigned to: Don Porter (dgp) Summary: invalid pathname caching? Initial Comment: Bytecompiling [uplevel]ed scripts (see uplevel.patch below) causes filesystem-1.11 to fail. This seems to be due to improper spoiling of some intrep when the value is stored as a literal? It looks similar to [Bug #1972867], but filesystem-1.11 test is not so easy to run in isolation (it relies on some previous tests having been run?). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pat Thoyts (patthoyts) Date: 2008-06-09 10:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=202636 Originator: NO Possibly the following from Windows XP are relevant: ==== filesystem-1.3 link normalisation FAILED ==== Contents of test case: testPathEqual [file normalize [file join dir.dir foo]] [file normalize [file join dir.link foo]] ---- Result was: not equal: C:/opt/tcl/src/kitgen/8.6/tcl/win/dir.dir/foo C:/opt/tcl/src/kitgen/8.6/tcl/win/dir.link/foo ---- Result should have been (exact matching): 1 ==== filesystem-1.3 FAILED ==== filesystem-1.4 link normalisation FAILED ==== Contents of test case: testPathEqual [file normalize [file join dir.dir inside.file]] [file normalize [file join dir.link inside.file]] ---- Result was: not equal: C:/opt/tcl/src/kitgen/8.6/tcl/win/dir.dir/inside.file C:/opt/tcl/src/kitgen/8.6/tcl/win/dir.link/inside.file ---- Result should have been (exact matching): 1 ==== filesystem-1.4 FAILED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: miguel sofer (msofer) Date: 2008-06-09 09:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=148712 Originator: YES That patch has been committed to HEAD now ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: miguel sofer (msofer) Date: 2008-06-09 09:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=148712 Originator: YES That patch has been committed to HEAD now ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Porter (dgp) Date: 2008-05-27 11:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=80530 Originator: NO Any relation to 953284? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110894&aid=1972879&group_id=10894 |