[Tcl-bugs] [ tktoolkit-Bugs-1591494 ] unixSelect 1.4, 1.5, 1.6 failure on tk cvs head

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #1591494, was opened at 2006-11-06 09:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112997&aid=1591494&group_id=12997

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: 67. Unix Window Operations
Group: current: 8.5a5
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 1
Private: No
Submitted By: Larry W. Virden (lvirden)
Assigned to: Joe English (jenglish)
Summary: unixSelect 1.4, 1.5, 1.6 failure on tk cvs head

Initial Comment:
tk 8.5 cvs head built with solaris 9 sun c compiler and
test suite display via exceed 10.0.0.12 on win xp

unixSelect.test

==== unixSelect-1.4 TkSelGetSelection procedure: simple
i18n text, iso2022 FAILED
==== Contents of test case:

    setupbg
    setup
    selection handle -type COMPOUND_TEXT -format
COMPOUND_TEXT .  {handler COMPOUND
_TEXT}
    selection own .
    set selValue \u00fc\u0444
    set selInfo {}
    set result [dobg {
        set x [selection get -type COMPOUND_TEXT]
        list [string equal \u00fc\u0444 $x]  [string
length $x] [string bytelength 
$x]
    }]
    cleanupbg
    lappend result $selInfo

---- Result was:
1 2 4 {COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000}
---- Result should have been (exact matching):
1 2 4 {COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000}
==== unixSelect-1.4 FAILED

==== unixSelect-1.5 TkSelGetSelection procedure: INCR
i18n text, iso2022 FAILED
==== Contents of test case:

    # This test is subtle.  The selection ends up
getting fetched twice by
    # Tk:  once to compute the length, and again to
actually send the data.
    # The first time through, we don't convert the data
to ISO2022, so the
    # buffer boundaries end up being different in the
two passes.

    setupbg
    setup
    selection handle -type COMPOUND_TEXT -format
COMPOUND_TEXT .  {handler COMPOUND
_TEXT}
    selection own .
    set selValue [string repeat x
3999]\u00fc\u0444[string repeat x 3999]
    set selInfo {}
    set result [dobg {
        set x [selection get -type COMPOUND_TEXT]
        list [string equal  [string repeat x
3999]\u00fc\u0444[string repeat x 3999
] $x]  [string length $x] [string bytelength $x]
    }]
    cleanupbg
    lappend result $selInfo

---- Result was:
1 8000 8002 {COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 4000
3999 COMPOUND_TEXT 7998 4000 C
OMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 4000 3999
COMPOUND_TEXT 7998 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 0
 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 4000 3998 COMPOUND_TEXT 7997 4000}
---- Result should have been (exact matching):
1 8000 8002 {COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 4000
3999 COMPOUND_TEXT 7998 4000 C
OMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 4000 3998
COMPOUND_TEXT 7997 4000}
==== unixSelect-1.5 FAILED

==== unixSelect-1.6 TkSelGetSelection procedure: simple
i18n text, iso2022 FAILED
==== Contents of test case:

    setupbg
    setup
    selection handle -type COMPOUND_TEXT -format
COMPOUND_TEXT .  {handler COMPOUND
_TEXT}
    selection own .
    set selValue \u00fc\u0444
    set selInfo {}
    set result [dobg {
        set x [selection get -type COMPOUND_TEXT]
        list [string equal \u00fc\u0444 $x]  [string
length $x] [string bytelength 
$x]
    }]
    cleanupbg
    lappend result $selInfo

---- Result was:
1 2 4 {COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000}
---- Result should have been (exact matching):
1 2 4 {COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000}
==== unixSelect-1.6 FAILED



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot)
Date: 2006-12-26 19:20

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1312539
Originator: NO

This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by
the administrator of this Tracker).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Larry W. Virden (lvirden)
Date: 2006-11-13 05:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=15949

what does "missing encodings" mean? I have installed the tcl 8.5 cvs head
that matches this tk. If 
something is missing, it would be missing from that tcl, right?  Just
confused on what this is all about.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Joe English (jenglish)
Date: 2006-11-12 16:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=68433

Can't replicate; possibly due to missing encodings?

Since these tests are about COMPOUND_TEXT selection targets
(which should be considered obsolete), this is low-priority
unless and until any actual related end-user problems are found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112997&aid=1591494&group_id=12997