Re: [Swig-user] Difference between uint16_t and unsigned short?

[Bo P. <be...@gm...>]

> > I do not seem to need this macro. Maybe swig has outgrown this? I am
> > using 1.3.29.
> 1.3.29 here also. Are you sure you don't need it? My experience is that
> it works fine on x86 machines, but on my AMD64 box it all compiles and
> links OK, but it makes all the int64_t variables be long long's rather
> than long's. This causes it to fail to spot template specialisations on
> int64_t, and makes arithmetic on int64_t's give wrong results. It was a
> very subtle error and took me ages to track down the cause.

This is a x86-64 RHEL4 system with Intel processors (not ia64). I have
verified that uint16_t is 16 bit and all my test cases run smoothly. I
guess the reason is that I am not using int64_t.

Cheers,
Bo