Re: [Swig-devel] =?utf-8?q?mangling_for_a_binding_where_=5F_is_a_prob?= =?utf-8?q?lem=2E?=

[William S F. <ws...@fu...>]

Ben Allan <baallan <at> dancer.ca.sandia.gov> writes:

> 
> 
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:12:10PM -0500, John Lenz wrote:
> > I would rather see a separate get_mangler.  Makes the code (in the
> 
> That's fine by me. Is it preferred that I resubmit an updated patch
> with the simpler functions, or will the patching
> person add getmangler on the fly? I'm happy with either option.
> I just don't know what the habits are in this project.
> 

Post the new patch as an attachment to the mailing list should be fine.

William