Re: [Swig-devel] Re; New SWIG Directions? User's point of view

[Dave Y. <ListMail@Yost.com>]

At 11:10 AM -0500 2006-11-16, Anton Deguet wrote:
>
>-1- Better documentation

Yes!

>-2- Better C++ parser with support for nested classes, expression
>evaluation (useful for template parameters with default values).

Yes!  The closer to full C++ the better.  Our code stresses C++ and especially templates a lot.  I haven't gotten that far with swig yet, but I have the usual fears that stressing it will not be pretty.

>Thanks to all the SWIG developers.

Amen, brother.

Dave