Re: [Swig-user] Read-only property in C++

[Olivier V. <oli...@gm...>]

Hi Bjoern,

Thank you for your answer. This is a good suggestion, but I think it is
more user-friendly to have properties rather than getters... this is why I
was wondering if this was possible with SWIG.

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Björn Simon <si...@al...> wrote:

> Hi Oliver,****
>
> ** **
>
> Why not having the member variables as private/protected and provide
> getter/setter for Username and only getter for Password?****
>
> So using DataSource more as a class than as a struct.****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> ** **
>
> Bjoern****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Olivier Voyer [mailto:oli...@gm...]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:47 AM
> *To:* swi...@li...
> *Subject:* [Swig-user] Read-only property in C++****
>
> ** **
>
> I'm wrapping C++ to Python using SWIG. How can I tell SWIG that a property
> is read-only?
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> class DataSource****
>
> {****
>
> public:****
>
>             DataSource();****
>
>             ~DataSource();****
>
> ** **
>
>             std::string Username****
>
>             std::string Password; // Read-only?****
>
> }****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> *Olivier* ****
>



-- 
*Olivier*