From: İsmail D. <is...@na...> - 2011-05-19 21:15:01
|
Hi; On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Stefan Zager <sz...@gm...> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:10 PM, İsmail Dönmez <is...@na...> wrote: > >> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Stefan Zager <sz...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, İsmail Dönmez <is...@na...>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi; >>>> >>>> I see Fedora applies two patches to swig for Python 3.2 compatibility: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=swig.git;a=blob_plain;f=swig200-rh623854.patch;hb=HEAD >>>> >>>> >>>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=swig.git;a=blob_plain;f=swig200-rh666429.patch;hb=HEAD >>>> >>>> Can anyone comment on those, I applied those to openSUSE swig package >>>> and it causes no issues with python 2.7 at least. >>>> >>> >>> Those are both redundant now. >>> >>> >> With the upcoming 2.0.4 release I guess? >> > > Yes, that's right. > All good then, thanks! ismail |