Re: [Swig-user] Suggestion for a minor Lua error checking improvement

[William S F. <ws...@fu...>]

On 21/04/11 13:47, Gedalia Pasternak wrote:
>
> Hi Swig list,
>     I started looking into adding this myself but I'm finding it a bit
> daunting to compile swig from scratch on windows.
>    There are a couple of function error messages that get produced in
> swigwin-2.0.3\Source\Modules\lua.cxx:
>
> SWIG_check_num_args(\"%s\",%d
> %d)\n",name,num_required+args_to_ignore,num_arguments+args_to_ignore);
> and
> SWIG_fail_arg(\"%s\",%s,\"%s\");
> currently name is just the function name in question... In really big
> applications with a large bound C++ api's it would probably be nice to
> have the object type for the function as well, ie
> ClassName::functionName it would make for a clearer error message, it
> would probably be only a few line change.
> thanks

I've committed a fix for release in swig-2.0.4 so now the fully 
qualified C++ name is shown.

William