You can subscribe to this list here.
2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(10) |
2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(1) |
2004 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(4) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(7) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(5) |
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Heimo C. <ha...@re...> - 2004-09-28 11:57:30
|
Thanks, Silvia. But I've been there, done this - firstly, that Sweep install on the "second" HD is perfecly Ok., and as long as there's not a _major_ improvement of Sweep (e.g., re memory requirements) there'd no reason for me to change it. Secondly, re-compiling Sweep on that now "first" HD is not doable, (a) as there is not the whole compiling shabang on it there, and (b) seen the whole cluster of needed additional prior/auxiliary prog.s/lib.s; cf. my post to this list of 31 Jul 2003. And (c), this present system install on the "first" HD is no _meant_ to do anything else but run apps. (One idea with this is to have it comparatively easy to backup/replicate, _without_ the voluminous "full system" paraphernalia.) [Matter of economy but that issue sees to drift out of sight for number of Lx developments.] -hc REM re Mdk.: for me their version 8.2 has shown to be rather reliable and stable. I have experimented with 9.2 and 10 with bad results - they seem to go the Win$ trail, "bleeding edge" gadgetry and "old" peripherals not supported any more. Argh. |
From: <Sil...@cs...> - 2004-09-26 21:01:39
|
Hi Heimo, Why not get the latest tarball and install from scratch? http://www.metadecks.org/software/sweep/download.html There's no difference about file formats FAIK and it should just work = with your existing data. Copying would entail copying all the related files (executable, = translations, configs, database etc.) in the correct directories, which = might be quite a job and not very reliable (you're bound to forget = some). Also, if you want speex, vorbis, libsoundfile and other codec libraries, = don't forget to re-install them too, if your MDK 8.2 didn't come with = these. (You'd be better off running the latest MDK version BTW). Cheers, Silvia. -----Original Message----- From: swe...@li... on behalf of Heimo Claasen Sent: Mon 9/27/2004 6:23 AM To: swe...@li... Cc:=09 Subject: [sweep-users] to transfer a Sweep install Maybe this question is somewhat naive; but. (And please note that I'm not a full-time, ultra-certified "system administrator".) I have a well running Sweep install (.8.2) on a system/harddisk which = had to be moved from its place as hda (and now is the reserve/backup, to be plugged in in an exchange bay if neded, as hdb). The new system install on hda is rather basic, i.e. without the (voluminous) 'development' stuff, and meant to just run applications. Both HDs have a same system (Mdk 8.2); theoretically it's possible to boot from the second HD but this creates a lot of hassle as too many of the references there would point to wrong mounting points etc.(and I wouldn't like to change all these as "hdb" is meant to be a true backup HD which could immediately replace "hda" if that one breaks down[*].) It _does_ work to run Sweep on/from that second HD with the system = booted from the first HD; but that's not the idea. I would rather like to transfer the well running Sweep installation, as it is, from the second HD to the first; and nothing but that. Thus the normal boot system would have a Sweep install and could use a third, really large HD as "hdb" for all data storage. How to ? // Heimo Claasen // <hammer at revobild dot net> // Brussels 2004-09-26 The WebPlace of ReRead - and much to read =3D=3D> = http://www.revobild.net [*] And please no word about hardware "stability" - during the last two month, and despite a new, control-tested power unit, I had 2 MoBo breakdowns in the same box, 1 HD gone, 1 256-SDRAN bar, and number of peripherals to replace - CD, Zipdrive, SCSI controller, you name it, it breaks. I think manufacturing quality really goes down rapidly. And that box started to run, with all-new essential parts, only a good three years ago, had already needed a main HD replaced, and the CD drive. I compare that to the "old" AT'286 with which I do all my text and mail and where the MoBo dates from 1992, the HD never broke but was replaced only with a larger one; the monitor (*1988) slowly faded away in '98 and was replaced by a similar one which reliably lights up every day since. And, btw, there was not one "system" breakdown and havoc that I could remember for the last decade. Oh well, this best runs (DR-)DOS... -hc ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ sweep-users mailing list swe...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sweep-users |
From: Heimo C. <ha...@re...> - 2004-09-26 20:21:58
|
Maybe this question is somewhat naive; but. (And please note that I'm not a full-time, ultra-certified "system administrator".) I have a well running Sweep install (.8.2) on a system/harddisk which had to be moved from its place as hda (and now is the reserve/backup, to be plugged in in an exchange bay if neded, as hdb). The new system install on hda is rather basic, i.e. without the (voluminous) 'development' stuff, and meant to just run applications. Both HDs have a same system (Mdk 8.2); theoretically it's possible to boot from the second HD but this creates a lot of hassle as too many of the references there would point to wrong mounting points etc.(and I wouldn't like to change all these as "hdb" is meant to be a true backup HD which could immediately replace "hda" if that one breaks down[*].) It _does_ work to run Sweep on/from that second HD with the system booted from the first HD; but that's not the idea. I would rather like to transfer the well running Sweep installation, as it is, from the second HD to the first; and nothing but that. Thus the normal boot system would have a Sweep install and could use a third, really large HD as "hdb" for all data storage. How to ? // Heimo Claasen // <hammer at revobild dot net> // Brussels 2004-09-26 The WebPlace of ReRead - and much to read ==> http://www.revobild.net [*] And please no word about hardware "stability" - during the last two month, and despite a new, control-tested power unit, I had 2 MoBo breakdowns in the same box, 1 HD gone, 1 256-SDRAN bar, and number of peripherals to replace - CD, Zipdrive, SCSI controller, you name it, it breaks. I think manufacturing quality really goes down rapidly. And that box started to run, with all-new essential parts, only a good three years ago, had already needed a main HD replaced, and the CD drive. I compare that to the "old" AT'286 with which I do all my text and mail and where the MoBo dates from 1992, the HD never broke but was replaced only with a larger one; the monitor (*1988) slowly faded away in '98 and was replaced by a similar one which reliably lights up every day since. And, btw, there was not one "system" breakdown and havoc that I could remember for the last decade. Oh well, this best runs (DR-)DOS... -hc |
From: Andrew B. <aa...@ci...> - 2004-09-12 16:36:45
|
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:27:13 +0200, Thomas U=DFm=FCller <ussmueller@gmx.d= e>=20 wrote: > Hello, > > I've compiled Sweep 0.8.3 with gcc 3.3 (Mips Pro didn't work) on Irix=20 > (SGI O2 R5k running 6.5.22). It seems to run normal except that I can't= =20 > listen to any sounds. When hitting the play button nothing happens.=20 > Neither does the bar move nor do I hear any sounds. It doesn't matter=20 > whether I hit the play all or the play selection button. I don't know IRIX but on linux when this happens its because another process has the sound device open and sweep blocks on open. |
From: Erik de C. L. <eri...@me...> - 2004-09-12 12:19:07
|
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 13:59:06 +0200 Thomas U=DFm=FCller <uss...@gm...> wrote: > I've just had a look into the source code, especially the file=20 > driver_solaris.c.=20 I'm not sure it that code works of not. > Would it be enough to write the functions=20 > (open_dev_audio, setup_dev_audio, etc.) in this file for Irix Maybe. Erik --=20 +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo no...@me... (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "Linux is produced to be used, whereas the others are produced to be sold" -- Bobby D. Bryant |
From: <uss...@gm...> - 2004-09-12 11:55:43
|
I've just had a look into the source code, especially the file driver_solaris.c. Would it be enough to write the functions (open_dev_audio, setup_dev_audio, etc.) in this file for Irix or would there be even bigger changes necessary to the source code. Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:27:13 +0200 > Thomas Ußmüller <uss...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I've compiled Sweep 0.8.3 with gcc 3.3 (Mips Pro didn't work) on Irix >> (SGI O2 R5k running 6.5.22). It seems to run normal except that I can't >> listen to any sounds. > > IRIX has a completely different audio I/O interface to Linux. > > To get this working you'll need to write an IRIX output driver. > > Erik |
From: Erik de C. L. <eri...@me...> - 2004-09-12 09:43:39
|
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:27:13 +0200 Thomas U=DFm=FCller <uss...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I've compiled Sweep 0.8.3 with gcc 3.3 (Mips Pro didn't work) on Irix=20 > (SGI O2 R5k running 6.5.22). It seems to run normal except that I can't=20 > listen to any sounds. IRIX has a completely different audio I/O interface to Linux. To get this working you'll need to write an IRIX output driver. Erik --=20 +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo no...@me... (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ A Microsoft Certified System Engineer is to computing what a MacDonalds Certified Food Specialist is to fine cuisine. |
From: <uss...@gm...> - 2004-09-12 09:23:49
|
Hello, I've compiled Sweep 0.8.3 with gcc 3.3 (Mips Pro didn't work) on Irix (SGI O2 R5k running 6.5.22). It seems to run normal except that I can't listen to any sounds. When hitting the play button nothing happens. Neither does the bar move nor do I hear any sounds. It doesn't matter whether I hit the play all or the play selection button. Thanks in advance, Thomas |
From: Roderik v. H. <ro...@or...> - 2004-09-02 22:17:14
|
Hi, i'm using sweep 0.8.1 (have tried 0.8.3 too, but that version seems to have a strange sound-lag), and somehow I don't seem to be able to play & record at the same time anymore. I open a file, make sure it is 'monitored', open another file, select it with ctrl-a and press record (twice, once to bring the record-screen up, once to make it record). While it's recording (which works when using the microphone), it just doesn't matter what I do with the first file (as in: press play, use scrubby, the QWERTY-piano keys) - it won't be recorded. I've searched the archive and the tutorial, but it remains unclear what I'm doing wrong / what I should do. I already recorded some stuff using sweep, and that's what baffles me most - it suddenly stopped working (!?), and IIRC, it suddenly started working in the first place: I had some trouble getting it to work (as I'm sure having now!). .. help me out! I love the way sweep should work, but I can't do scr*b now! Thanks in advance, Roderik. |
From: cecil <ce...@re...> - 2004-08-04 23:29:42
|
How do I choose one channel to edit in a multi-track project? I would like to be able adjust one or two channels at a time while the whole project is on screen - as in changing volume level or pasting additional vocals into and new channel without pasting over the rest of that segment. |
From: Neil K. <nkl...@sb...> - 2004-07-23 20:51:18
|
The freeverb issue and the bug fix was discussed on the LAU mailing list. http://music.columbia.edu/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2004-July/013489.html Neil Klepeis wrote: > Hi, > > A strange thing: Sweep 0.8.3 (compiled on linux) can seem to find most > or all of the SWH and CMT plugins on my computer, _except_ for GVerb. > GVerb does not show up anywhere in the Process menu. This seems very odd. > > Also: I seem to be able to create nice lush hall reverbs in GVerb > (using gnusound or another client), but Freeverb3 in CMT doesn't do it > for me. I've tried many parameter combinations, but they all seem to > just give a rather subtle small room effect. Anyone else have any luck? > > --Neil > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > _______________________________________________ > sweep-users mailing list > swe...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sweep-users > -- _______________________________________________ Neil E. Klepeis -- Human Exposure Scientist http://klepeis.net http://exposurescience.org |
From: Neil K. <nkl...@sb...> - 2004-07-23 19:40:06
|
Hi, A strange thing: Sweep 0.8.3 (compiled on linux) can seem to find most or all of the SWH and CMT plugins on my computer, _except_ for GVerb. GVerb does not show up anywhere in the Process menu. This seems very odd. Also: I seem to be able to create nice lush hall reverbs in GVerb (using gnusound or another client), but Freeverb3 in CMT doesn't do it for me. I've tried many parameter combinations, but they all seem to just give a rather subtle small room effect. Anyone else have any luck? --Neil |
From: Christoph L. <Chr...@gm...> - 2004-06-19 18:05:00
|
Hi, I'm currently looking for a replacement for Broadcast 2000, which was a great wav editor, but does no longer run on Fedora Core 2. I'm currently evaluating Sweep, and it looks quite promising (I really like the scrub feature - this is great!), but there's one very important feature (for me), which I miss, or probably have not yet seen: "Save Selection As ...", which saves the highlighted selection directly as WAV-File to disk, without having to copy, create a new file and past (which takes way too much time). Does this feature exist, and if yes, where? Or is it planned to be implemented? Thank you very much Christoph P.S.: I'm using sweep 0.8.3 -- Christoph Lorenz <Chr...@gm...> |
From: Erik de C. L. <eri...@me...> - 2004-04-28 10:36:55
|
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:30:56 +1000 Conrad Parker <co...@me...> wrote: > Conrad. > -> faster than a dead fish But only just!!!! ;-) Erik -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo no...@me... (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "If POSIX threads are a good thing, perhaps I don't want to know what they're better than." -- Rob Pike |
From: Conrad P. <co...@me...> - 2004-04-28 10:31:05
|
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:11:39AM -0800, sw...@sa... wrote: > On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 12:26:36 +1100 > > Erik de Castro Lopo <eri...@me...> wrote: > > > Probably not. I'll see if I can have a chance to look at it this weekend. > > Here is a patch against 0.8.2. Seems to work here. > > Feedback to the list please. > > that seems to have fixed it. gah, patch applied in cvs Conrad. -> faster than a dead fish |
From: Conrad P. <co...@me...> - 2004-04-25 00:43:44
|
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 08:31:22PM -0400, Frank W McCormick wrote: > > Hi All > > Does anyone know whether Sweep is still being worked on? Its been > almost a year since 0.8.2 was released. Hi, yes, but it's not allowed to go longer than a year without a release! I've gotten back into sweep development, and opened up the development process. This means: * sweep is back in cvs at sourceforge! * the development process is opening up. Previously it was just a matter of me accepting patches by email and publishing tarballs, now it's in cvs and a few developers have been added to the project. Conrad. |
From: Frank W M. <fmc...@sy...> - 2004-04-25 00:31:32
|
Hi All Does anyone know whether Sweep is still being worked on? Its been almost a year since 0.8.2 was released. Thanks -- -------------- Frank McCormick Montreal -------------- |
From: Heimo C. <ha...@re...> - 2004-03-03 13:29:22
|
Hmm. Put in as much RAM as the MoBo can hold. I'm at the max with 784 MB on this one and Sweep still crashes when it comes up to have loaded about 18 or 20 takes and/or above 30 min in all. (and there's no on-board video or anything else running, besides a most meager GUI.) All the rest is less important (provided a good sound card, for sure.) I run Sweep on a AMD-K2 (366 MHz) without any problem. ps - Long time no hear from Conrad. Evenly a long time ago did he say he's conscious about the mem problem and had the intention to do something about it... ps2 - just read that one from Erik: > The memory requirements can be calculated as > follows: > memory usage = 4 * channels * sample_rate * seconds_of_audio If I understand this right this would be the mem needed for files to be loaded but there is quite some overhead - or a "socket" - too, in the region of 300M. // Heimo Claasen // <hammer at revobild dot net> // Brussels 2004-03-03 The WebPlace of ReRead - and much to read ==> http://www.revobild.net |
From: Roodog <ro...@ho...> - 2004-03-03 12:52:24
|
I am using Mdk 9.1 Linux on a P111-500 setup, 256mb ram. Sweep 0.8.1 is installed and loads OK. I can load a file, and see it on the screen. All I have managed to do so far is play with the Sample menu, but as soon as I try to do anything else everything freezes and I have to kill the program. Is this problem generic to Mandrake 9.1, or have I not installed it correctly maybe? Thanks for any help. David -- Remove _nilspam_ to reply. |
From: Erik de C. L. <eri...@me...> - 2004-03-02 22:11:37
|
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:36:50 -0500 "Chris Puccio" <ch...@mx...> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Im not a sweep user nor know much about the audio world, so I have a basic > question for you. I have a project im working on for somebody and would like > to know what would be the ideal hardware configuration - memory and CPU wise > to use sweep to its maximum potential? Current versions of Sweep load the whole file you are looking at into memory. The memory requirements can be calculated as follows: memory usage = 4 * channels * sample_rate * seconds_of_audio That means that if you have any plans to look at large files you should get as much memory as your machine can handle and you can afford. In terms of CPU requirements, any 500MHz or better CPU will be adequate. Erik -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo no...@me... (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "Only wimps use tape backup: *real* men just upload their important stuff on FTP, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)" -- Linus Torvalds |
From: Chris P. <ch...@mx...> - 2004-03-02 21:50:27
|
Hi guys, Im not a sweep user nor know much about the audio world, so I have a basic question for you. I have a project im working on for somebody and would like to know what would be the ideal hardware configuration - memory and CPU wise to use sweep to its maximum potential? Thanks! -chris |
From: Heimo C. <ha...@re...> - 2004-01-21 13:21:40
|
I never ever got Sweep's recorder working either. No trouble for my part, I use a nice little recorder separately (Yarec) and wonder in any case about the benefit of Sweep's recorder - it's too rudimentary anyway to be of much use. So why bloat Sweep with yet another functionality which is nor really needed ? btw - mixer + recorder run on another desktop in order to have a _little_ less clutter on the Sweep screen; switching is reasonable fast but I wonder how to set up an entire second monitor besides (there's this nice little 8.4" VGA idling in a closet and it would be just fine for that. But there's only a simple ISA video card left - though even a free slot for it on the Mobo. Someone who has an idea how to go about ?) // Heimo Claasen // <hammer at revobild dot net> // Brussels 2004-01-21 The WebPlace of ReRead - and much to read ==> http://www.revobild.net |
From: Aurelio C. <Aur...@ya...> - 2004-01-17 18:21:56
|
Hi everyone I am trying to record some music with Sweep, but I don't know how. I tried the following: 1) I created an empty file, say 30 seconds 2) I cared that the cursor for recordings was at the beginning 3) I selected the whole file 4) I pressed record so that the window opened and then the button with "rec" Now the strange part: the recording begun for a few seconds (4 or 5), it became faster and after two more seconds it stopped, although the file was 30 seconds large. The recording was empty. Can somebody tell me what happened, what I am doing wrong and how I can correct that? Thank you all Aurelio |
From: <sw...@sa...> - 2004-01-16 09:11:47
|
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 12:26:36 +1100 > Erik de Castro Lopo <eri...@me...> wrote: > > Probably not. I'll see if I can have a chance to look at it this weekend. > Here is a patch against 0.8.2. Seems to work here. > Feedback to the list please. that seems to have fixed it. |
From: Conrad P. <co...@me...> - 2003-12-12 06:34:24
|
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:57:37PM -0600, Kent williams wrote: > I just installed Sweep 0.8.2, along with the swh-plugins on a a Redhat 9 > system. > > I build both the swh ladspa plugins and sweep configured to go in a 'sandbox' > tree, not /usr/local or wherever. In other words I did this: > > in sweep-0.8.2: ./configure --prefix=/scratch/kent > in swh : ./configure --prefix=/scratch/kent > > So the programs and libraries are in /scratch/kent/bin, /scratch/kent/lib > etc. > > When I run Sweep, it works fine, but I can't find any place in the menus or > user interface that looks like it would let me use LADSPA plugins. The > process menu only shows the builtins: Echo, Fade In, Fade Out, Normalize, > Reverse, Select by Energy etc. > > What am I missing here? Hi Kent, try setting the LADSPA_PATH environment variable before running sweep, ie: LADSPA_PATH=/scratch/kent/lib/ladspa sweep Conrad. |