From: peter <zen...@ze...> - 2006-08-10 04:25:33
|
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 12:55 +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: >From: Rados.aw Korzeniewski <rad...@ko...> > > > [ ... ] > > You listed so many items that perhaps we should look if there is > some other editor which already have most of the features, and > then all we should join that project. ;-) > that there be fightin' talk mista! ;) i would add these to Radoslaw's list: insert silence tool generic options dialog to house those new options that would otherwise have no home. Disk Space monitoring (with pervasive alerts and forecasts) resample outputs (apparently the alsa resampler is linear so we should handle it internally until that changes. provide a visual indicator when resampling is in effect? ) drop all drivers bar gstreamer and jack? (someone contacted me on irc expressing an interest in implementing gstreamer I/O themselves. whether it covers enough bases depends on what we want to support i suppose) drop ogg/speex loaders when they are supported by sndfile implement a gstreamer loader? implement a pipe save/loader that can specify params for an external codec (lame binary, wavpack binary etc)? provide default settings for common codecs. (similar to grip) plugin browser with blacklist, categories and bookmarks (i've mostly done this, dunno whether it's worth a damn yet because having designed it, i know very well how it works and so can't easily judge how easy it will be for others to use it.) support for ardour's ladspa preset file format Xv or GL accel for the display? wrap effect tail or grow sample for the tail loop effect n times (grow sample accordingly) and.. many many more i'm sure. ------------------------------- i don't really have many criticisms of those new features that Radoslaw has already listed but the question is one of priority and order. ideally i'd like to clean all the spam out of the trac tickets and then put all these features in. that way we could associate them with releases or other features that need to be implemented first. then create a front page in the trac wiki that lists them all and allows for registered users to leave comments and suggestions. ..ideally ;) it might not be worth it in the long run but i find the idea of a giant flat TODO list to be pretty depressing. so keeping it in the trac allows us to state more clearly which features *would be nice* and which are likely to be implemented in the near future. floating ideas in the trac also makes it convenient for Conrad to veto, OK or otherwise change them in accordance with his vision for sweep. however.. if you hold your breath waiting for me to do this, i'll not be held liable for any damage done when you become unconscious and fall over. =) pete. |