From: Chris D. <mo...@in...> - 2004-05-12 03:51:47
|
(This was from before, but noone else was on the list at the time.) I asked, "I noticed that the Rerunnable interface is showing up in the public javadoc for SuiteRunner. Should it really be there? Should the Rerunnable interface be package-level instead of public?" I did a little looking and noticed that Report can take a Rerunnable, so my above question was LAME. But why is Rerunnable needed at all? Why wouldn't all tests be able to be rerun if necessary? Thanks, Chris |