From: H.J. L. <hjl...@gm...> - 2012-02-06 15:44:07
|
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Dmitry V. Levin <ld...@al...> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:19:55AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch avoids segfault when there are holes in system call table. >> It can happen with syscall (number, ...) and number is in those holes. > > We don't have sysent tables with holes yet, do we? I am working on such a target, x32. > Another question is, assuming that we have such sysent tables, should > those syscalls be treated exactly the same way as syscalls which numbers > are out of range? > I don't mind either way as long as strace doesn't segfault. -- H.J. |