From: Dmitry V. L. <ld...@al...> - 2011-06-23 13:57:50
|
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 01:42:20PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > Hi, > > TCB_FOLLOWFORK flag seems to be unnecessary, because we either follow > all [v]forks/clones or don't follow any, therefore global variable > followfork is an already existing indicator of what we want to do. > > This patch drops all setting/clearing of TCB_FOLLOWFORK bit, > and replaces checks for this bit by checks of followfork value. > > In internal_fork, check is moved to in front of if(), since > the check is needed on both "entering" and "exiting" branch. > > Please review. Looks OK. -- ldv |