Re: [Stlport-devel] string template expressions

[Petr O. <pt...@is...>]

On Wednesday 19 July 2006 12:35, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> 
> > 2. IMO derive from 'string' class is marginal, not 'string template
> > expressions' and I would prefer present 'string template expressions' as
> > default even in favor of deriving from 'string'.
> 
> I don't understand you here. Did you perhaps confuse 'derive' with 'deviate'? 

class YetAnotherString : public string
{
}

YetAnotherString  is derived from string, right?

Bests,

      - ptr