Re: [Stlport-devel] string, operator [] const

[Petr O. <pt...@is...>]

On Saturday 11 February 2006 00:08, François Dumont wrote:
> Petr, could you explain why you roll back this code ?
> 
> As I told you there is no reallocation in c_str so the issue you are 
> describing below cannot occur.
> 
> In addition to being more complicated, the current implementation is 
> returning a const reference to a temporary data which is bad, Borland 
> complains about it.

François,

See here: I recheck string implementation and found that in all cases
allocated at least n + 1 bytes (n == string length). So (default!) mode
!_STLP_FORCE_STRING_TERMINATION lost any sense.

   - Petr