Re: [Stellarium-pubdevel] QT-ization

[F. C. <fab...@go...>]

STL is faster. But for most use, it's more important to have readable code
and cleaner error messages. I think Qt ones are more memory efficient
(especially for QString), at least for QList.
Fabien

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Matthew Gates <mat...@gm...> wrote:

> On Sunday 24 February 2008, Fabien Chéreau wrote:
> > Yeah, the container is not so important as long as it's not in the API.
> > When writting new code I think it would be better to use Qt containers,
> > especially for things which don't require that much speed.
>
> Do you know if the QT versions of STL containers (e.g. map, vector) are
> better or worse performance?  I never had a complaint about the
> performance
> of the STL classes, although they could be prettier to use.
>
>
> Matthw
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list
> Ste...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel
>