RE: [SSI-users] After RH9?!
Brought to you by:
brucewalker,
rogertsang
From: Karl V. <kar...@se...> - 2003-11-21 15:07:52
|
Fedora Core is the playing ground for Redhat Enterprise releases (ie. A new RHEL is based on a certain Fedora Core release). So in that aspect, FC seems to be a possible target. My understanding of the FC project is that they want community involvement and are willing to accept external patches. So maybe this also means that an integration of OpenSSI in FC is possible/accepted. The problem with FC is that it is a fast moving target (new release every 6 months), which might make development work on OpenSSI problematic?! -----Original Message----- From: Aneesh Kumar KV [mailto:ane...@di...] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 15:49 To: Karl Vogel Cc: 'ssi...@li...' Subject: Re: [SSI-users] After RH9?! Karl Vogel wrote: >I was just wondering which will become the development platform of >choice after RH9? Will this be Fedora Core 1 or one of the Redhat >Enterprise lines?! > >If I'm not mistaken, the end-of-life for RH9 is somewhere in Q1 of >2004. > > > I am also interested in this ? Bruce ? . If we move to REL then we will have less number of user. But then in my understanding the whole purpose of core developers concentrating on Redhat linux was to get the openSSI into a distro that's supported by vendors. So we are in a confused state where, to get a supported distro by vendors we need to move to REL but then we will have to neglect all the advantage of large user base, because very less end user will have REL. ? -aneesh -- ph: 603-884-5742 |