[SSI-devel] [ ssic-linux-Bugs-996897 ] Downed soft mounts can panic
Brought to you by:
brucewalker,
rogertsang
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-01-02 01:58:57
|
Bugs item #996897, was opened at 2004-07-23 19:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rogertsang You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=405834&aid=996897&group_id=32541 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. >Category: Filesystem Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: David Zafman (dzafman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Downed soft mounts can panic Initial Comment: 0xc232c000 263493 263447 1 1 R 0xc232c420 *find EBP EIP Function (args) 0xc232df2c 0xc023bf45 cfs_reqlist_free+0x55 (0xc32ff760, 0xc365f000, 0xc232c000, 0xc365f050) kernel .text 0xc0100000 0xc023bef0 0xc023bf80 0xc232df44 0xc022279f cfs_put_super+0x1f (0xc365f000, 0xc0511360, 0xc05113cc, 0x c127cc00, 0xc365f000) kernel .text 0xc0100000 0xc0222780 0xc02227d0 0xc232df64 0xc0158773 kill_super+0x193 (0xc365f000, 0xc127cc00, 0xc36104e0, 0xc36c2720, 0x0) kernel .text 0xc0100000 0xc01585e0 0xc01587a0 0xc232df80 0xc016df50 __mntput+0x20 (0xc127cc00, 0xc232c000, 0x100, 0x1) kernel .text 0xc0100000 0xc016df30 0xc016df60 0xc232df98 0xc0127b46 do_exit+0x216 (0x100, 0xc232c000, 0x42130910, 0x1) kernel .text 0xc0100000 0xc0127930 0xc0127ce0 0xc232dfb0 0xc0127e23 do_group_exit+0x83 (0x100) kernel .text 0xc0100000 0xc0127da0 0xc0127e50 0xc232dfbc 0xc0127e61 sys_exit_group+0x11 (0x1, 0x1, 0x4212e130, 0x42130910, 0x1 ) kernel .text 0xc0100000 0xc0127e50 0xc0127e70 0xc010b3f3 system_call+0x33 kernel .text 0xc0100000 0xc010b3c0 0xc010b400 The super_block here has an a flags 0x81 which is MI_SB_DOWN | MI_CLEANED. This means that the routine super_clean_node() has been run because it is a soft mount. It has mi_server of 1 which is the node that just went down. The super block may have already been killed at this point which may mean that the code isn't handling refcounts properly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Roger Tsang (rogertsang) Date: 2008-01-01 20:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1246761 Originator: NO Bug report is outdated (w.r.t. SSI-1.9) since we moved to newer base kernel-2.6. Before we close this bug we need to verify whether this problem exists in SSI-1.9 / 2.0.0preX ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=405834&aid=996897&group_id=32541 |