Re: [SSI-devel] Re: Regarding DRBD on 1.9

[Roger T. <rog...@gm...>]

Yeah I know.  Look at the _entire_ patch.  It manages to guarantee
failover completion before all priority 0 services.

-Roger

On 5/31/05, Aneesh Kumar <ane...@gm...> wrote:
> On 5/31/05, Roger Tsang <rog...@gm...> wrote:
> > Try this one instead.
> >
>=20
> I don't think  you should use CLMS priority -1. As per the
> documentation http://ci-linux.sourceforge.net/enhancing.shtml  -1
> means no odering is ensured.  What is the CLMS service do you think is
> happening along with DRBD. I see CFS failover happening at 1 . That
> means 0 should be ok for DRBD.
>=20
> -aneesh
>