Re: [SSI-devel] Cluster service naming

[Brian J. W. <Bri...@hp...>]

John Byrne wrote:
> CLMS and ICS aren't really a part of the hooks. We're using them for now 
>  as part of a proof of concept to show that the clusterproc hooks 
> suffice. I don't think there is any way we are going to sell CLMS and 
> ICS to the world at large.
> 
> At the moment the CLMS and ICS we are using in the hooks is the same as 
> the 2.6 code. If we change them for the hooks, then we have to branch it 
> and I really don't want to branch just to make it prettier, because then 
> we have to maintain the branch.
> 
> If we do end up keeping CLMS and ICS as part of our hooks-based 
> implementation, then we have a lot of work to do to change things so 
> they require no base hooks of their own. At that point, we can change 
> the naming conventions.
> 
> John


I'm fine with that.

Brian