[SSI-devel] RE: [SSI-users] Re: openSSI webView 0.1 released!
Brought to you by:
brucewalker,
rogertsang
From: En C. L. <en...@in...> - 2004-11-02 11:00:51
|
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 16:13, Karl Vogel wrote: > > > One suggestion I have is to not separate the nodes into master and > > > slaves. A master/slave architecture implies that the master > > is a single > > > point of failure, which is not true in OpenSSI. It's better > > to call it > > > the "init node". I see you use this term in one of your > > detail views. > > > > I understand and agree with this. > > However, from my user point of view, the initnode still > > appears as a single > > point of failure, since if it crashes, all the cluster > > collapses. Even with > > redundant root filesystem (DRBD or shared SCSI), loosing init > > nodes will > > bring the whole cluster down. So, in my understanding, and > > If you have shared disk hardware, the initnode can go down without > the whole cluster going down. The cluster will fail only when *all* the initnodes go down. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE > LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Ssic-linux-users mailing list > Ssi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-users > |