[SM-USERS] =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_[SM-USERS]_What_is_an_insecure_image=3F?=

[Luc B. (m. lists) <mai...@sl...>]

Bron Gondwana said:
> Luc Brouard said:
>> It was said on the list that an insecure image was one not from the
>> domain name corresponding to the mail address of the sender.
>
> I would disagree with this.  Consider the following:
>
Yep, I had read the list before too fast and remembered too badly, my fault.

>
> I like the option of only allowing viewing of suspect images AFTER the
> user has looked at the message and a pair of human eyes have
> validated it as safe.  Even then, humans are easy to social engineer,
> but that is just life.
>

I like that option myself ... I hadn't moved to sq 1.2.3 and 1.2.4
because it removed the possibility to view html messages.
But with this link (at the bottom of the messages), I like it better that
before.

Luc