From: Marc G. K. <ma...@sq...> - 2006-04-10 08:52:22
|
On Mon, April 10, 2006 09:40, eCet wrote: >> I agree. What we could do is if the message count in a folder > your >> supposed 5000 then do FETCH 1:* UID first (which is fast) and then take >> a slice of that. With the resulting id's we can create a message set and >> provide the UID search argument to the thread call and we are done. >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Marc Groot Koerkamp. >> > > This is for all develpoers of SM: > > > I see, that You don't take care of my performance bugreport, and > feature request. You can't even say that you don't get my emails through > this list. Sorry, we have other priorities. In the limited time I have next to my daytime job and personal life (which was almost destroyed due to my busy schedule)I also keep myself busy with SquirrelMail development. The last month I was working on centralised initialization code. That had much more priority then dealing with feature requests. And for the record I don't get paid for any of the SquirrelMail development activities I do. The same counts for all other SquirrelMail developers. That means that feature requests like dealing with large threaded messagelist views has no priority at this moment and it has to wait till the planned integration of search and right_main takes place. So your options are: * Create a patch yourself * Wait till another SquirrelMail developer gives priority to your request * Pay me enough money so I can spoil my girl friend Regards, Marc Groot Koerkamp Development leader SquirrelMail PS: This is not the mailinglist to talk about development issues. Use the squ...@li... list for that. |