From: Antoine Delignat-L. <an...@de...> - 2007-06-18 15:06:38
|
Larry Garfield wrote : > > That tradeoff comes against PHP 5 right now only because so many web hosts > currently run PHP 4. The incompatibilities between 4 and 5 are not that huge > if you've been writing clean code all along. If you don't have legacy code > to worry about, then there's nothing holding you back from writing PHP 5 code > other than slow web hosts. > ... > But really, this thread is turning into a gripe fest about PHP 5 > implementation details. That's not what I wanted to be discussing here. :-) > Several projects are pushing to switch to PHP 5, for the increased speed if > nothing else. There's no requirement that apps be completely rewritten to do > everything with a dozen classes and objects. We believe there are benefits > to all PHP applications in participating in this effort, and the more > projects participate the greater the benefit. That's why we are asking > Squirrelmail to join the effort. > > I'm not sure I understand your "effort" correctly. You actually want to encourage projects to break compatibility with PHP4 only to force hosting companies to switch to PHP5 ? No one doubts the benefits of the new features and improvements, but as far as SquirrelMail is concerned, minimal server requirements is among the guidelines of the project (or so I understand). SquirrelMail can run smoothly on PHP5, so I don't see the advantage there would be to drop PHP 4 support while the code is compatible only because Ruby and Python are gaining popularity. Cheers, Antoine |