From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2006-06-26 20:42:26
|
On 6/15/06, Tomas Kuliavas <to...@us...> wrote: > >>> is the fix based on SM 1.4.6 or 1.5.1? > >>> > >>> I (or you) can make it available at SM patch forum to the community > >>> (until patch is officially applied). > >> > >> You can't do that. Code without copyright information belongs to its > >> creator. Only code owner can modify copyrighted code. > >> > > As far as I understood, every plugin on sm.org has to follow some sort of > > open source copyright policy. As we know there is a problem with official > > plugin fixing (I'd posted some changes over a year ago to author and > > mailing list and still nothing happened / a strict no-go for > > enhancing/patching existing plugins on SM.org from other authors). > > I build SM patch forum. There I host diff files. For me, that is allowed > > and will not breach any copyright. > > > > Did I get this wrong? > > I am not your lawyer. ip_users plugin does not have any information that > allows modification of the code nor anything about distribution. For me > such plugin is not open and can't be modified. If code developer does not > add copyleft license, standard copyright laws are applied to developer's > code. Thanks to everyone for their interest and patches, etc. Instead of trying to resolve fuzzy issues about this person's code, a new plugin that supplants (and is much more flexible than) ip_users should be released in the next few days, or possibly sooner. Thanks, paul |