From: Daniel W. <d...@ni...> - 2005-06-02 22:33:42
|
p dont think wrote: > > > Daniel Watts wrote: > >> Rafael Martinez wrote: >> >>> p dont think said: >>> >>>>> I have a general aversion to patches - would it not be best to >>>>> provide this as a >>>>> plugin? This way when squirrelmail is upgraded the >>>>> administrator will not have to remember to rerun the patch (which >>>>> may not work >>>>> anyway for the new squirrelmail version!). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I am thinking of putting it into the core so it will be part of an >>>> upcoming release. >>>> >>> >>> >>> I sent a report about this problem some time ago with a patch/hack >>> to fix it: >>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=2356700 >>> >>> It works for me but if you implement another solution into the core >>> it will be even better. >>> >> >> I'm guessing this patch no longer applies because the function it >> references no longer exists. Is there an updated patch for 1.4.4 >> anywhere? >> >> Or in fact something in 1.5.0 which i can copy into 1.4.4? > > > 1.5 has "bypass trash" checkbox which handles the problem. With that, > I'm not sure we need to automate the process, since some users will > NOT like their mail getting immediately deleted w/out their knowledge. If bypass trash is not selected it would be elegant if squirrelmail detected a quota violation and suggested "There is no room to place a copy in your Trash folder. Proceed with delete anyway? [no] [yes]" Otherwise you just get a really ugly imap error. |