Re: [SM-DEVEL] Changes to mime.php

[Marc G. K. <ma...@it...>]

That's OK.

The reason why I submit the patch is because without the patch I can't
continue.Another reason is the way SM detects html messages is not quite correct
and not according RFC standards.What I want is that SM makes corrects descisions in what to view with the
extra information now added tothe message->header

The only thing critical in the patch is the way SM finds image attachments
for html mail. With my patchthey only can be found if the html entity is part of a multipart/related
entity and I think that's correctand if it's not I change it.

I SM 1.2.6 is released I continue with the next steps

Marc Groot Koerkamp.

> At 23:54 15-04-2002, you wrote:
>>Next step is making the correct entities vissible.
>
> I'd rather see the next step being the release of 1.2.6 and postpone
> other-than-critical bug fixes till after this release.
>
>
> Thijs
>
>
> --
> squirrelmail-devel mailing list
> List Address: squ...@li...
> List Info:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-devel
> http://squirrelmail.org/cvs