From: Ezequiel G. <eze...@va...> - 2014-04-10 21:20:11
|
On 10 April 2014 16:50, Phillip Lougher <ph...@lo...> wrote: [..] > > The one instance I can still find is the vandalising of the > wikipedia page on Squashfs, which was milder than a lot. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SquashFS&diff=503333315&oldid=503325197 > > Open source is an example of the tragedy of the commons, the few > spoil it for the rest. I'm not paid to take abuse for code I > developed and released publically. > Wow. That's just amazing, how stupid people can be is something that never ceases to surprise me. [..] >> >> This "poorman's fsck" might be good enough for my needs >> (squashfs on top of a UBI volume on top of a NAND device, where there are >> other mechanisms to check the consistency of the data). > > > Yes, it undoubtedly will be good enough for that. > Great, thanks a lot for confirming this. > >> >> However, we need to have a good way of checking the filesystem >> before mounting, so I'll double check it and take a deeper look. >> >> Once again, sorry for bothering. Wasn't my intention, but quite the >> opposite. >> > > Np, you've just bumped the "write an fsck" TO DO list item a couple of > places. > :-) FWIW, squashfs is great and I really appreciate your effort. -- Ezequiel García, VanguardiaSur www.vanguardiasur.com.ar |