Re: [SQLObject] SQLObject introspection: help!

[Carlos R. <car...@gm...>]

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:01:53 +0300, Oleg Broytmann <ph...@ph...> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:43:39AM -0300, Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
> > -- In a data-oriented implementation, we either (a) create a new dict
> > for the full column set of the class (including ancestor fields)
> >
> > ----> Option (a) is interesting -- it solves the iteration & find
> > column problem, at the cost of little space, and is fast.
> 
>    That were my thoughts from the very beginning. I personally in favour
> of this solution. In SQLObject class a new member is just a pointer to
> _columnDict. In InheritableSQLObject it should be a separate member.

Ok. I'll see what I can do & I'll provide a patch.
 
> > (btw, I don't understand the need for a underscore prefix on sqlmeta
> > contents. They're already inside a special structure.
> > sqlmeta.columnDict is better IMHO)
> 
>    Yes, I think so, too.

Time to ask Ian, or is it fine to rename it? (I guess the former :-)

-- 
Carlos Ribeiro
Consultoria em Projetos
blog: http://rascunhosrotos.blogspot.com
blog: http://pythonnotes.blogspot.com
mail: car...@gm...
mail: car...@ya...