Re: [SQLObject] (no subject) Really: Transaction problem

[Ian B. <ia...@co...>]

On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 11:04 AM, Randall Randall wrote:
> On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 11:36 AM, Ian Bicking wrote:
>
>> Oops... I think that was a bug, fixed in CVS.  I should probably roll 
>> a new version from the current CVS, actually.
>
> Does that mean I should just use the CVS code?  Is
> it considered stable enough to use for production?

Well, most of the changes since the last release have been bug fixes 
and features that shouldn't effect stability (Sybase support, for 
example).  So I think it's better to use CVS.

   Ian