Re: [SQLObject] should Transaction.commit makeObsolete?

[Kevin D. <da...@gm...>]

On 6/22/05, Oleg Broytmann <ph...@ph...> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 04:30:47PM -0400, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
> > On 6/21/05, Oleg Broytmann <ph...@ph...> wrote:
> > >    How can the transaction (which is a connection) understand this?
> > > Should it parse SQL queries?
> >
> > I'll grant that that's ugly. A simple solution would be to just look
> > at whether any queries have run through the transaction.
>=20
>    Any query including SELECT?!

If you want to get around parsing the SQL, yes. That's still better
than the current state which is to issue a rollback on __del__ even
when the transaction has been committed and is done.

Kevin