From: Doug C. <idi...@us...> - 2011-03-20 20:15:38
|
Some kind of special tracking might be nice for "major" or "breaking" changes. But automation is always nice. On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Chris Bagwell <ch...@cn...> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for opinions on ChangeLog. Git "commit" keeps very good > records of what's going on and is a good alternative to the ChangeLog > we currently manually maintain. > > Do you guys think we should continue with ChangeLog concept (manual > update) or switch to git history? > > An option is to do the following to roughly generate the ChangeLog: > > git shortlog SOX_14_3_1..HEAD > > We can do this once towards release time and update the file. > > Chris > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit > for your organization - today and in the future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > SoX-devel mailing list > SoX...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel > |