[Soaplite-devel] Re: UDDI v2 and v3 support

[Byrne R. <by...@ma...>]

Keep in mind, I can package and distribute a UDDI::Lite with 
SOAP::Lite... which is probably better than SOAP::UDDI.

As for your last comment - this is perfect feedback for the SOAP::Lite 
API... to be able to proxy options passed to the 'use SOAP::Lite' 
call... I think there are a number of ways to do this, so let's chat 
about it when you have a chance.

Let's also move this thread to the soaplite-devel mailing list as 
sourceforge...

Mark Fuller wrote:

> Hi Byrne,
>  
> I'm pleased you would like UDDI to be part of the SOAP distribution. I 
> didn't want to do my own distribution.
>  
> I agree with you that "WS::" conveys the natural hierarchy. It may not 
> be easy to change after the current hierarchy has been widely used.
>  
> You can plan on hearing from me in around 2 weeks. I'll need someone's 
> time to review it. There are a couple of things I need someone 
> experienced with SOAP::Lite to consider. For example,
>  
>   - I put the SOAP::Lite instantiation in SOAP::UDDI. I like the idea 
> of making it easier to use (don't have to think about SOAP::LIte). 
> But, it makes it harder to alter the "use SOAP::Lite" options. For 
> example the trace options if someone needs to debug what is happening.
>  
> Until then,
> Mark
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th 
> <http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html>