Re: [Snort-inline-users] question to the list

[Ixion <ix...@cf...>]

Please forgive me if I come across as a fool, but I am running Snort-2.0.=
5
with Libnet-1.1.0 on Gentoo and flex_resp seems to be working like a
champ. I have ' resp: rst_rcv;' appended to all lines in my TCP rules. I
assumed with snort running without an issue this meant flex_resp was
working.

Since Inline_snort replaces Snort I wouldn't think there'd be a problem
going either way.. that is unless there are other things than snort that
depend on libnet?

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> List,
> 	I've received a few emails asking why snort_inline still uses
> libnet version 1.0.2a.  The reason I have not upgraded to the current
> version of libnet is because flexresp still utilizes libnet version
> 1.0.2a, and I did not want to add yet another required library for
> snort_inline to work.
> 	Does anyone see advantages or disadvantages to sticking to libnet
> version 1.0.2a?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Rob
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 6.5.8
> Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
>
> iQA/AwUBP/HVovnAyY+9KLjdEQLtfQCfZEt4cYyb7OC2Mhr6o2MGetYzz0cAn0kJ
> 3WpQFLh7KL7hk1BOMMaZSYHO
> =3DOAL1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM=
's
> Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admi=
n.
> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1278&alloc_id=3D3371&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> Snort-inline-users mailing list
> Sno...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-inline-users
>