[Snarl-dev] Snarl Network Functionality
Stuff Happens - know about it.
Brought to you by:
cheekiemunkie,
stan050
From: Chris P. <chr...@fu...> - 2008-12-02 14:03:00
|
In order to get R2.1 I've decided to significantly reduce network functionality in Snarl. To this end, the following features will not be included: - Notification forwarding - Per-class forwarding This doesn't represent a reduction as this functionality isn't in place at the moment anyway. However, the main reason for this was because I can't quite decide how best to implement it. Which is the reason for this post. As I see it, there are two ways we can implement network forwarding: Option 1: Have a static list of hostnames/IP addresses defined in the network tab. Snarl will forward selected notifications to these addresses Option 2: Define the destination on a per-class basis. Up until today I was going with Option 1 but this, I feel, will be too restrictive for most users. Of course, Option 2 is the most flexible but could also get very annoying if you *do* want to send all notifications to the same destination. What is everyone thoughts on this? Would you be happy with Option 1, Option 2, or some other suggestion? |