From: Stephen R. N. <sr...@co...> - 2003-11-27 23:25:27
|
I have a group of identical machines. On one of them the self tests fail: smartctl -l selftest /dev/hda smartctl version 5.25 Copyright (C) 2002-3 Bruce Allen Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ =20 =3D=3D=3D START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION =3D=3D=3D SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 Num Test_Description Status Remaining=20 LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error # 1 Short offline Completed: electrical failure 90% =20 12447 0x01d93468 # 2 Extended offline Completed: read failure 90% =20 12447 0x00072451 # 3 Conveyance offline Fatal or unknown error 00% =20 12447 - # 4 Short offline Completed: electrical failure 90% =20 12447 0x01d60fc0 =20 On the other machines, they go fine. -a gives: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE =20 UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 081 074 034 Pre-fail=20 Always - 48678064 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0003 070 070 000 Pre-fail=20 Always - 0 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age =20 Always - 2 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 036 Pre-fail=20 Always - 3 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 081 060 030 Pre-fail=20 Always - 121179747 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 086 086 000 Old_age =20 Always - 12447 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 100 097 Pre-fail=20 Always - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age =20 Always - 80 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 033 050 000 Old_age =20 Always - 33 195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered 0x001a 081 074 000 Old_age =20 Always - 48678064 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age =20 Always - 0 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 100 100 000 Old_age =20 Offline - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 200 200 000 Old_age =20 Always - 0 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age =20 Offline - 0 202 TA_Increase_Count 0x0032 005 158 000 Old_age =20 Always - 95 =20 The stand-out value there is TA_Increase_Count, which is 95 vs 0 on the other machines (if I understand the numbers correctly). Firstly, is this bad (it looks bad - the self test results look very bad). Secondly, is there a guide to interpreting these values somewhere? I'm not even sure if higher or lower is bad in the VALUE WORST and THRESH columns. Thanks, Stephen |