From: John H. <jo...@ha...> - 2013-04-05 11:44:36
|
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Alex Samorukov wrote: > On 04/05/2013 11:54 AM, John Haskey wrote: >> >> I understand what the code is doing. The question is why does every >> ioctl after the one that is skipped report the same error? Look at >> this abridged output here: >> >> http://haskey.com/johnh/misc/smart6_abridged.txt >> >> The fourth reported ioctl gets the ATA return descriptor not supported >> message and then so does every ioctl following it. > It should not affect actual output, because return code is 0. I will fix > this bogus message, but i don?t think that it may cause any real issues. > Thanks! I'm getting closer to figuring out where my array is getting broken. After a certain command in a certain situation (not entirely clear just yet) the drive being tested starts generating command timeouts and is removed from the array. ---john. |