From: Christian F. <Chr...@t-...> - 2011-08-06 11:49:17
|
ion coting wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Christian Franke > <...> wrote: > >> ion coting wrote: >> >>> >>> Usinghttp://smartmontools-win32.dyndns.org/smartmontools/smartmontools-5.42-0-20110616-r3380.win32-setup.exe >>> on xp sp3 32bit - >>> once using /dev/csmi0,0 -d ata, and then /dev/sda -d ata (same drive) >>> >>> http://pastebin.com/VzN9SFHX >>> http://pastebin.com/F0Bu6tdu >>> >>> >>> >> For further diagnostics please provide output of: >> >> smartctl -r ioctl,2 -d ata -A -f brief /dev/sda >> > http://pastebin.com/336PUDN9 (output from linux) > http://pastebin.com/t5jk2T0N (output from windows) > > Both outputs look good. This suggests that /dev/csmi0,0 output is buggy. Please provide also this output from the Windows version: smartctl -r ioctl,2 -d ata -A -f brief /dev/csmi0,0 >> >> >>> The drive is NOT in a intel fakeraid, it's just a ICH9R but configured >>> in native sata mode. >>> >>> >> This is probably a bug in the standard (non-RAID capable) ATA pass-through >> I/O-control of the Intel driver. >> > I take that back - the CSMI (RAID capable) I/O-control is affected. (I somehow exchanged the outputs from your first post) If other disks are connected to this controller: Is there also a difference between /dev/sdX and /dev/csmiN,M ? Thanks, Christian |