From: Tim S. <ts...@di...> - 2008-01-30 02:25:18
|
Further news... SeaTools whined about SMART being tripped. Didn't have time to run a long test... Powered down the server then rebooted. Booted fine. smartctl now says: SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 112 097 006 Pre-fail Always - 46563275 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0003 096 092 000 Pre-fail Always - 0 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age Always - 39 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 036 Pre-fail Always - 0 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 052 051 030 Pre-fail Always - 1340072750381 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 770 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 077 097 Pre-fail Always In_the_past 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age Always - 36 187 Unknown_Attribute 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 189 Unknown_Attribute 0x003a 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 190 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 063 050 045 Old_age Always - 623181861 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 037 050 000 Old_age Always - 37 (Lifetime Min/Max 0/18) 195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered 0x001a 078 053 000 Old_age Always - 227697377 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 100 100 000 Old_age Offline - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age Offline - 0 202 TA_Increase_Count 0x0032 100 253 000 Old_age Always - 0 Wonder if this is spurious or a real problem... I'm running a RAID5 scrub in linux overnight - that ought to upset it if anythign will. Cheers Tim Tim Southerwood wrote: > Tim Southerwood wrote: > > ... > >> 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 052 051 030 Pre-fail Always - 335777683494 >> 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 768 >> 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 077 077 097 Pre-fail Always FAILING_NOW 0 > > I'm going to add something here... > > Both seagates are increasing their seek error rates steadily. Yet both > seem to be operating OK - no whines from linux in dmesg. > > Also, more interestingly, the seek error rate above equates to nearly > half a million seek errors PER SECOND that the drive's been powered up. > > This seems unlikely... > > This particular drive does fail a short online test though. > > I am in a position to run Seagate Tools on it *after* my backups to > another server are finished(!). > > I'll report what that says... > > Cheers > > Tim > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Smartmontools-support mailing list > Sma...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartmontools-support |