Re: [Slashcode-general] blocks vs. templates?

[Nathan V. <na...@th...>]

Duh, that should be .shtml.

http://projects.thethirdsector.com/slashguide.shtml

Dan and I intended to contribute it to the slash project, which is why he
put it in the patches section on sourceforge.  Or maybe it'll go in Alex's
FAQ or whatever.  It's not that well-written but it's a lot better than
the wrong, outdated stuff in the getting_started.shtml that ships with
slash 2.0.  And also now it's in POD to match the rest of the docs.

So, the license is "here have this we needed it anyway and we're also
trying to show off because our company really needs some more slash
consulting work right now."

-n

On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Brian Aker wrote:

> Nathan Vonnahme wrote:
> > First of all, we rewrote the getting_started document last week, and it's
> > available on sourceforge (in POD format...but uh, needs updating already),
> > and also at
> >   http://projects.thethirdsector.com/slashguide.html
> > It covers the blocks/templates distinction a bit.  Comments on that
> > document are welcome...
> I am getting a 404 on the document. What license is the document
> under? AKA at some point I want to add some more docs to slashcode
> and if it is well written, then it would make for a nice addition.
> 	-Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Slashcode-general mailing list
> Sla...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general
>