From: Jim P. <ji...@ya...> - 2001-04-13 15:59:31
|
Chris, Thanks for your very informed assesment. I too would like to hear what other knowledgable people have to say on this issue. Specifically I wonder if it is possible to have a seperate mod_perl.deb/rpm that has all these items enabled. Hmmm, I'm off to learn Debian packaging. ;) Thanks again, -Jim P. --- Chris Nandor <pu...@po...> wrote: > At 22:46 -0700 2001.04.12, Jim Popovitch wrote: > >Having to recompile your webserver, just to run Slash, may have been > >cool with version 1.0. However this is the 2.0 release, can't *we* > do > >what other weblogs/storyboards are capable of without recompiles of > >standard software components? Maybe that is nirvana. But if we aim > >for perfection we will only be that much closer. > > I should also add that our primary goal in Slash is to create and > maintain > high-performance software to run Slashdot. This is not what other > weblogs/storyboards are capable of. :-) Many of the hooks we make > into > Apache/mod_perl are for performance reasons, and we won't take them > out > just because they are not in default installs. > > However, as noted a bunch of times, I don't know what hooks we use > that the > defaults don't. If we do find out what the problem areas are, > specifically, then it is certainly feasible in theory to work around > them > for people who can't/don't want to recompile Apache. I'd really > appreciate > whatever specific information on this that anyone could offer. > > -- > Chris Nandor pu...@po... > http://pudge.net/ > Open Source Development Network pu...@os... > http://osdn.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Slashcode-general mailing list > Sla...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ |