From: <Vl...@ge...> - 2003-06-20 15:56:13
|
August?! The problem I see with that (as someone on the outside looking in) is the upgrade stuff. Not only is that a short period of time to declare a feature freeze, fix all outstanding bugs, and what not, but the upgrade stuff isn't ready yet from what I understand. Sure, it would be nice to have a 2.2.7, or a 2.4.0, but at the rate slash is evolving, it might be more like 3.0 in December or next year. The T_ and R_ tags are, IM(NS)HO annoying, sure. But, with tallented people like you submitting patches, and the team cranking out code on this, I think we can put up with it a while longer. :-) Scott -- /"\ / For information and quotes, email us at \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / in...@lr... X AGAINST HTML MAIL / http://www.lrsehosting.com/ / \ AND POSTINGS / vl...@lr... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: sla...@li... > [mailto:sla...@li...]On Behalf Of > shane > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:24 AM > To: sla...@li... > Subject: [Slashcode-development] release plan > > > What's OSDN's plans for releasing Slash? > > Will we ever see a 2.2.7 or 2.3? > > Is the plan to 'go by cvs' for the forseeable future? > > I ask because it is extremely hard to tell people, that > inorder to use a > plugin, they need to be using CVS. Is that CVS from this > morning? yesterday? > 5 days ago? 3 months? > > Yes, I understand about T_ tags, and R_tags. I've used both. > The point I want > to make is that with 'going by cvs' seemingly being the way > it'll be for a > while, it makes it really hard to release a plugin that is > compatible with > current slash - unless you go by 2.2.6 or a T or R tag. (and > people don't > always seem to understand the tagging, and/or take the time > to read the > information that's out there about how t_ and r_ tags are used). > > Personally, it would be far easier for me if it were decided, > and released, > that the next version will be 2.2.7 and you'll try to put it > out in august. > Atleast that way we can release code that's compatible with > it. Releasing > code that works with 2.2.6... well, that's almost over a year old now. > > I don't want to rile any feathers, just find out what the > plan of attack is. > > Thanks, > Shane > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU > Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU > Hosting Partner. > Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly > Commission! > INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php > _______________________________________________ > Slashcode-development mailing list > Sla...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-development > |